Popular
Accessibility
Have Irlen Syndrome, or need different contrast? Click the button below for options.
Background Colours
Subscribe
Enter you email address below to subscribe to free customisable article notifications.
Alternatively, click the button below for our various RSS Feeds (available journal wide, or per section).
Browse \ Series \ Ivey v Genting Casinos: A Landmark Case
The Supreme Court’s decision in Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] heralds a major change in what constitutes ‘dishonesty’ in criminal law. The unanimous decision, penned by Lord Hughes, is rich with talking points and looks set to transform how a number of key offences are dealt with by the courts. In a two-part series, Connor Griffith examines the reasoning and ramifications of the decision.
Series Editor: Connor Griffith
![[Envelope]](http://www.keepcalmtalklaw.co.uk/static/kctl/subscribe-mini-icon.1447075479.png){kind=icon}
Articles In This Series
Ivey v Genting Casinos Pt II: The Debate on Defining Dishonesty
In the second of a two part series, Connor Griffith documents the labyrinthine case law that underpins the civil law definition of dishonesty which the Supreme Court, in its landmark judgement in Ivey v Genting Casinos, adopted into the criminal law.
12:00, 24th November 2017
Ivey v Genting Casinos Pt I: Card Counting and Dishonest Gambling
A gambler's attempts to boost his chances of winning big at a casino seem an unlikely basis for a landmark decision. But in the first of a two part series, Connor Griffith examines how the Supreme Court's ruling in such a case could have major ramifications for the criminal law.
12:00, 21st November 2017
Free Subscription