Have Irlen Syndrome, or need different contrast? Click the button below for options.
Background Colours
The Supreme Court’s decision in Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] heralds a major change in what constitutes ‘dishonesty’ in criminal law. The unanimous decision, penned by Lord Hughes, is rich with talking points and looks set to transform how a number of key offences are dealt with by the courts. In a two-part series, Connor Griffith examines the reasoning and ramifications of the decision.
Series Editor: Connor Griffith
In the second of a two part series, Connor Griffith documents the labyrinthine case law that underpins the civil law definition of dishonesty which the Supreme Court, in its landmark judgement in Ivey v Genting Casinos, adopted into the criminal law.
12:00, 24th November 2017A gambler's attempts to boost his chances of winning big at a casino seem an unlikely basis for a landmark decision. But in the first of a two part series, Connor Griffith examines how the Supreme Court's ruling in such a case could have major ramifications for the criminal law.
12:00, 21st November 2017Subscribe to Keep Calm Talk Law for email updates, and/or weekly roundups. You can tailor your subscription on activation. Both fields are required.