Popular In This Section
Accessibility
Have Irlen Syndrome, or need different contrast? Click the button below for options.
Background Colours
Subscribe
Enter you email address below to subscribe to free customisable article notifications.
Alternatively, click the button below for our various RSS Feeds (available journal wide, or per section).
Recent Articles
Sports Arbitration Revisited Pt II: Mutu and Pechstein v Switzerland
Following the recent case of RFC Seraing and Doyen Sports Company v FIFA and Others [2018], the ECtHR took a look at the concerning world of mandatory arbitration clauses in sports contracts in the hugely important Mutu and Pechstein v Switzerland [2018], handed down last week.
12:00, 16th October 2018Sadomasochism following R v Brown: Domestic Violence or Sexual Autonomy?
The issue of whether consent can be a defence to sadomasochist sexual activity is applied inconsistently by the courts. The decisions are influenced by a number of biases - especially attitudes towards homosexuality and marriage. This article considers the implications for personal autonomy.
Sports Arbitration Revisited Pt I: Mutu and Pechstein v Switzerland
Following the recent case of RFC Seraing and Doyen Sports Company v FIFA and Others [2018], the ECtHR took a look at the concerning world of mandatory arbitration clauses in sports contracts in the hugely important Mutu and Pechstein v Switzerland [2018], handed down last week.
Book Review: 'Under the Wig' by William Clegg QC
'Under the Wig' is an autobiography by one of England's top criminal barristers. William Clegg QC - head of 2 Bedford Row - writes about his life and some of his most significant cases. The book is entertaining and engaging, but its greatest strength is its accessibility.
Financial Fair Play in Football: Curbing the Excess or the Enthusiasm?
Football, a favourite pastime of the nation, is also the basis for truly ludicrious levels of investment, winnings and spending. As such, UEFA introduced Financial Fair Play Regulations to discourage football team insolvency. This article assess the compatibility of the Regulations with EU law.
The Beatles Duo: Applying Precedent to a Human Rights and Judicial Review Claim
A recent leaked letter by Sajid Javid MP to the American Attorney General demonstrated Javid is not seeking assurance the US will not use the death penalty on the Isis 'Beatles duo'. This move has been called ‘unprincipled, incompetent, and almost certainly unlawful.’
R v MK: Clarifying the Defence in Section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act
Under Section 45 of the Modern Slavery Act 2015, victims of trafficking have a defence when charged with certain criminal offences. In a recent decision the Court of Appeal was asked to decide on whom the burden of proof lies; in a welcome decision it restored the orthodoxy.
Film Review: 'The Children Act' - Does Justice Care?
The Children Act is the film adaptation of Ian McEwan's novel, the plot of which follows the interactions between a teenage Jehovah's Witness refusing a blood transfusion and the High Court judge tasked with deciding his case. This review considers how the perception of justice compares to reality.
Free Subscription